NOTE: This webpage provides resources for this course. It is NOT the course syllabus and DOES NOT provide information about course assignments, requirements, or expectations. Please consult the course syllabus for these types of questions.

Defining Archive
An archive refers to an organized collection of records or cultural artifacts (which may be fixed on any media), as well as the location in which these records are kept. Archives can be considered either "information" generated as a by product of human activity, or as specifically authored information products.

Archiving, then, is the process, the practice, of collecting, preserving, organizing, managing, and adding value to a grouping of information or artifacts.

Historically, archives were well developed by the ancient Chinese, Greeks, and Romans. Modern archiving is generally seen as having its roots in the French Revolution. The French National Archives was created in 1790 during the French Revolution from various government, religious, and private archives seized by the revolutionaries. This archival collection is perhaps the largest in the world, with records dating back to A.D. 625.

Archives may take many approaches to their structure and operation. Three examples are:
These and other archives are focused on preserving paper artifacts, in their original state, and making them available, in some way, to everyone who can pull some value from these artifacts. So, a big concern for archives is the preservation and protection of the original artifact.

Digital archives relieve some of this pressure in that users can access digital facsimile copies of the original artifacts. But, if the digital archival media suffers physical damage then the information they contain may be lost. So, a big focus of digital archiving is also protection and preservation.

Defining Archivist
An archivist is a professional who assesses, collects, organizes, preserves, maintains control over, and provides access to information determined to have long-term value. The information maintained by an archivist can be any form of media (photographs, video or sound recordings, letters, documents, electronic records, etc.)

Preservation of document, pictures, recordings, digital content, etc., is a major aspect of archival science.

New discoveries in the fields of media preservation and emerging technologies require continuing education as part of an archivist's job in order to stay current in the profession.

Defining Curator
Curator is Latin and means "guardian" or "overseer."

A curator of a cultural heritage institution (e.g., archive, gallery, library, museum or garden) is a person who cares for the institution's collections and their associated collections catalogs. The object of a curator's concern necessarily involves tangible objects of some sort, whether it be artwork, collectibles, historic items or scientific collections.

The role of the curator will encompass: collecting objects, making provision for the effective preservation, conservation, interpretation, documentation and cataloging, research and display of the collection; and to make them accessible to the public.

Here is a job announcement for a curator. Note the special skills and experiences sought in candidates
The Henry Ford Associate Curator of Technology

The Henry Ford seeks a knowledgeable, thoughtful, and dynamic individual with a proven track record to join a committed team of intellectually curious colleagues as the Associate Curator of Technology. The Associate Curator of Technology helps manage, develop, research, and interpret The Henry Ford world-class collections relating to the American history of technology dating from the 17th century to the digital age and relating those to program and exhibit development, as well as other relevant initiatives at The Henry Ford.

The Henry Ford is the history destination that brings the American Experience to life and is comprised of Henry Ford Museum, Greenfield Village, The Henry Ford IMAX Theater, Benson Ford Research Center, Ford Rouge Factory Tour, and Henry Ford Academy.

The Associate Curator of Technology must possess a deep and broad understanding of significant American objects, stories, and lives that are relevant to the programming and collecting initiatives of The Henry Ford.

  • Develops detailed knowledge and understanding of major collection areas and keeps abreast of the latest scholarship on historical and material culture issues relating to the collection.
  • Identifies key artifacts for acquisition by the institution through the active cultivation of donors and other potential sources.
  • Responsible for cataloguing collections in a timely manner.
  • Guides conservation, collections management, and registrars to prioritize and recommend treatments based on exhibit needs and program use.
  • Recommends objects for exhibit and program use, ensuring accuracy, authenticity, and accessibility.
  • Responsible for development of creative work which includes, but is not limited to, publications in any medium, product and program development and design, and all related collateral materials.
  • Instrumental in developing content for program and exhibition planning according to initiative parameters; serves as the institution's content expert on that topic; develops the topic report for which the content of exhibits and associated products are based.
  • Collaborates on the development of public programs, Village installations and products in all venues; creates written manuals and trains interpretive staff for new and/or revised programs.
  • Serves as an institutional spokesperson for a variety of subjects and collection areas; offers lectures, tours, and/or classes as required.
  • Positions the institution as a nationally significant leader in the historical and museum fields by publishing on collections, exhibits, and/or areas of expertise; developing symposia and participating in panels and conferences; consulting with other institutions.
Requires a Bachelor's degree (minimum) in American History, the History of Technology, or related field; knowledge of American social and cultural history from the 17th century to the present; knowledge of the history of American technology, with an emphasis on communications and information technology; and knowledge of American material culture. Requires a minimum three years' professional experience (curatorial or related experience preferred); excellent writing, editing, and verbal communications skills required.

Defining Curating
Curating is the process of identification and organization of artworks or other cultural objects in a collection in order to further knowledge. It includes verification and additions to the existing documentation for objects.

Curating is the process of examining, testing and selecting information to go in a collection database. Typically this adds considerably to the value of a database, but is very labor intensive.

Curating is the selection of specific objects and then arranging them to tell a story. So, curating is about narrative.

Back to Top
Digital Curating—Models
Models for curating a collection of cultural objects include:
Back to Top
Digital Archival Structure
Once the digital archive is physically secure and readily available to all interested users, the next challenge is to create an interface that allows users to access all the contents (which may be text, graphics, video, audio, etc). Two methodologies for accomplishing this task are outlined below.

Encoded Archival Description
Encoded Archival Description is an XML standard for encoding archival finding aids, maintained by the Library of Congress in partnership with the Society of American Archivists. EAD originated in 1993, at the University of California, Berkeley. The project's goal was to create a standard for describing collections held by archives and special collections, similar to the MARC standards for describing regular books. Such a standard enables museums, libraries, and manuscript repositories to list and describe their holdings in a manner that would be machine-readable and therefore easy to search, maintain, exchange.

Metadata
Metadata is, simply defined, information (data) about a particular content of a larger collection of information (database). Therefore, metadata is information (data) about information (data). Metadata is used to facilitate the understanding, utilization, and management of data (information).

Depending on its context of use, and the type of data it describes, metadata may vary. For example, the metadata describing a library's collection of science fiction books may be quite different than the metadata describing a collection of photographic portraits. Metadata for the former might include author name, book title, publisher, publication date, and description of content. Metadata for the latter might include photographer name, subject name, print size, date the original photograph was taken, camera settings, date the print was produced, and details of its production.

In both examples, note that the metadata must be at a higher level of abstraction than the data (information) it describes. Metadata "Author Name," for example, is an abstraction of "John Barber." The metadata "Print Size" is at a higher level of abstraction than "11 x 14''.

This allows for an expansion of a definition for metadata, which now can be seen as structured, encoded data (information) that describe the characteristics of information-bearing entities. Metadata thus can facilitate the identification, discovery, assessment, and management of that data (information) it describes.

Such hierarchical arrangements, or relationships between data and metadata are more properly called an "ontology" or "schema" because they describe what exists in order to facilitate some purpose or to enable some action. For example, the subject headings in a library catalog (metadata about the library's collection of books and other holdings) serve as both guides to finding books on the library shelves as well as what exists in the library collection (its ontology) and how descriptions of these items (metadata) are derived from the more general subject headings.

The difference between data and metadata can be confusing. For example, the headline of an article is both its title (metadata) and part of its text (data). The headline is thus both simultaneously data and metadata.

Data and metadata can also change roles. For example, a poem is data (information) but when the poem is sampled in a song lyric then the same poem can be considered metadata for the song lyric.

Despite these, and other confusions and criticisms, metadata can be useful as a guide to finding specific items or resources. In this case metadata is often expressed as a set of keywords that describe either the resource itself (name and size of data) or the content of the resource ("an interactive version of the poem 'The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner'"). Such metadata resides either with the resource, or in some detached, often external storage site.

With regard to a repository of digital data, there are three categories of metadata: descriptive, structural, and administrative.

Descriptive metadata provides information about the content of the information object, finding aids, or other schema, like bibliographic records, that can be used to facilitate search and retrieval.

Structural metadata ties an information object to others in order to create a logical information unit, like how individual pages make up a book.

Administrative metadata facilitates the management of the information object, or controls its access. This could include information about its copyright, storage format, and long-term preservation/utilization.

Criticism of metadata notes that because it is expensive and time-consuming to produce neither corporate or private users are inclined to create metadata on their own. Current lack of automatic tools for creating metadata is also a detriment.

Even if metadata is created, it is subjective and dependent on context or application.

And since there is no end to metadata (as we have seen, by definition metadata is data about data. Therefore, it is possible to create metadata about metadata ad infinitum), the usefulness of the original information resource may be quickly buried by the amount of metadata associated with its description.

Despite these criticisms, metadata may be most useful for archiving the new screen. For example, The Electronic Literature Organization is making preliminary attempts to define and categorize different kinds of electronic literature. Could this be a model for archiving and providing metadata about artifacts created for the new screen?

Metadata could be used to help represent knowledge by showing connections between separate bits of information.

Metadata could be used to inform future viewers how they might best access the artifact after it has been orphaned by technological advancement and new state of the art.

Back to Top
Archival Informatics
Archival informatics is the study of systems and technology in archives and how they have affected the nature and use of archives.

Media Description Lifespan
Hard Disks Hard disks consist of magnetic platters that spin at high speeds while reading or writing data. Due to the velocity, hard disks tend to suffer from physical degradation within a period of three years or so. 3 to 6 years
Magnetic Tapes Magnetic tape drives are the chosen backup media for enterprise storage. Their resilience, large storage capacity (1 terabyte or more) and fast writing speeds make them suitable for archiving large amounts of data quickly. 10 to 20 years
Magnetic Disks Used for temporary storage and transport of data, discs like Iomega's Zip and Castlewood's Orb are cheap, their capacity and usability value decent. But their physical and data degradation is faster than other media since they are more adversely affected by conditions like high temperatures. 1 to 5 years
Optical Discs CD-ROM, CD-R, DVD-ROM and DVD-R are popular optical storage media but their durability varies due to difference in their protective coating—CD-R's tend to have a shorter lifespan of ten years while the denser, more expensive DVD usually last anywhere from 70 to a 100 years due to the high quality of their dye coat. 10 to 100 years
Static Memory Devices like thumb drives and Compact Flash cards utilize static, non-moving RAM for storing data. Their inert nature makes them expensive but protection from constant wear-and-tear affects also makes them less prone to physical degradation than movable media, giving them a longer product life. 50 to 100 years

Back to Top
Course Resources—Archiving
Online
Books
Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age
Deegan, Marilyn and Simon Tanner
London: Library Association Publishing, 2002
ISBN: 1-55570-437-9
Read an online review HERE

From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World
Borgman, Christine L.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000
ISBN: 0-262-02473-X
Read an online review HERE

The Mirage of Continuity: Reconfiguring Academic Information Resources for the 21st Century
Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources and the Association of American Universities, 1998
Read a review online HERE

Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives
Kenny, Anne R. and Oya Y. Rieger, editors
Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group, 2000
ISBN: 0-9700225-006
Read an online review HERE

A Modern Archives Reader: Basic Readings on Archival Theory and Practice
Daniels, Maygene F. and Timothy Walch
National Archives Trust Fund Board/U.S. General Services Administration. Washington, DC. 1984
The archive has of late proven to be a powerful metaphor: history is viewed as an archive of facts from which one can draw at will; our bodies have become a genetic archive since being digitally opened up in the human genome project; our language is an archive of meanings that can be unlocked using philological tools; and the unconscious is an archive of the traumatic experiences that mold our identity. More and more artists and architects are developing software systems in which data is automatically organized into complex knowledge systems, a process in which the user is only one of the determining factors.

Notes from selected essays in this book:
Hilary Jenkinson ("Reflections of an Archivist")
T. R. Schellenberg ("Archival Principles of Arrangement")
Two basic principals of arrangement (150)
  1. "Principle of Provenance": archives should be arranged according to their source
  2. "Principle of Order": archives should be arranged according to their source
Two things to be accomplished by arranging records (151)
  1. Preserve their evidential values
  2. Make them accessible for use: necessary to arrange records so they can be described effectively. Arrangment should facilitate description of records
Other factors influencing archival arrangement
Back to Top
Course Resources—Curating
Online
Books
Curating New Media
Sarah Cook, et. al.
Baltic 2002
ISBN-10: 1903655064

Notes from the book:
Curatorial decisions are usually made in such a way that they are there to justify the hardware investment and are not the reflection of any understanding [of artifacts under curation, the artists who created them, or the audience for which they are intended] (14)

However, it may be best to first ask "What does the artist need?" and not think so much about the hardware. Figure out what the artist needs to have her work shown properly and figure out how to meet that need (43)

When people come to museums and art galleries—are they looking for a curated, edited experience? (35)

How does one collect and curate and archive online works? (71)

Is there any way one can curate websites? Is there a way to bridge the experience of the artist/designer creating a website for the private experience of an individual user to a public showing of websites in a gallery setting? (40)

How best to present works made on a computer essentially for one-to-one experience? A dedicated computer for each piece? (51)

Online work is essentially a broadcast medium. Museums want people to come through the doors, be physically present to see the works (79)

Problem: taking works created for the web out of the web does a great deal to destroy those works (41)

Question of control: if we curate web works how do we prevent viewers from leaving those works and going elsewhere on the web? Do we want this control? Is it necessary to the effective showing of the work? (41)

When you curate online work in a gallery space which is not online do you curate that work in the wrong place, someplace that is not its home? Is the work decontextualized? (42)

One solution may be to have artists make works that bridge the gap between the virtual and physical worlds (146)

If the actual curating of online work is done online then it is done by everyone who views or uses that work in some way. This is called "links." Drawing attention to these works in some way encourages viewers to visit the links you have provided (42-43)

Presentation (encounter) = success. The space and the arrangement of the work and the way you present it is fundamental in influencing how it is received and understood (47)

No special challenge dealing with digital art because, just as with any other work, you, as the curator, have to understand the work, the ideas, the intention of the artist and then find a specific way to exhibit the work without forcing a curatorial idea upon it and in a way that communicates the ideas behind the work through the medium of its exhibition (52)

The curatorial challenge = how to create balance (70)

Do audiences exist for new media? Do people want to see works created on and for viewing on computers? (88)

Education will help grow an audience. Tell audience what they are seeing, why it is important, etc. (88)

Education provided by artists who make new media art. They explain their work, medium, efforts, etc. (88)

How do we show new media work to people? Computers? Galleries? Other contexts/environments? (101)

The major principle of new media = variability (102)

The curator's role is to make new media art communicable, mediative, and manageable (102); to act as a producer, facilitator, someone who helps artists realize their ideas (148)

But, the roles may be changing as we move toward a convergence and swapping of roles and relationships between artists, curators, and audiences (104)

Curators as guides can help audiences filter through sea of data being produced daily; help audiences get to important issues of work (109)

But, are curators really relevant (needed) if artists can present their own work on line? Do curators provide other benefits the artist cannot? (133)

Online work, net art, provides direct access to audiences. No need for gatekeepers like curators? (138)

Important to start archiving net art. But how? As "linked objects" stored as metadata, information about the work, or as "cloned objects," copies of the work itself that can be periodically updated as technologies for their viewing or interaction change? (142)

Three preservation strategies: 1). documentation of the work, 2). migration of the work to evoling software or hardware so that its stays current, 3). emulation of the work through the reproduction of its orginal software state (142-143)

Filtering versus curating: the traditional paradigm of curating is creating few content artifacts from many potential sources and then publishing the results in some way (exhibitions, etc) so that other people can see. Filtering involves multiple streams of potential artifacts, all of which are available in some way; creating a many-to-many communication environment (145)

Art curators versus archival librarians: archivists are obsessed with consistency and compatibility; want patrons to be able to search across the holdings of multiple libraries and archives in a standardized way, with predictable results. On the other hand, people do not always think in the ways (categories) devised by archival librarians so the problem becomes how to match the way librarians index with the way other people index (for example on various current social networking web sites) (149)

Digital divide = access to net art or online archives is limited by race, class, and socio-economic barriers. We must think of ways to bridge these barriers (150)

Need to question existing curatorial models, "Why are we doing this?", "How are we doing this?" Artists and curators need to collaborate to question traditional models and to develop new ones (186)

Curating Immateriality
Joasia Krysa
Autonomedia 2006
ISBN-10: 1570271739
Reflects on the changes the Internet has stimulated for art curation and examines the work of the curator in relation to a wider socio-political context. Articulated through two key issues, immateriality and network systems, this book considers how the practice of curating has been transformed by distributed networks beyond the rhetoric of free software and open systems. Because the site of curatorial production has been expanded to include the space of the Internet, the focus of curatorial attention has been extended from the object to processes to dynamic network systems, multiple agents and software. This upgraded "operating system" of art presents new possibilities of online curating that is collective and distributed "even a self-organizing system that curates itself. The curator is part of this entire system but not central to it. The subtitle of the book makes reference to the essay "The Work of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems" (1988), in which Bill Nichols considered how cybernetics transformed cultural production. He emphasised the shift from mechanical reproduction (symbolised by the camera) to that of cybernetic systems (symbolised by the computer) in relation to the political economy, and pointed to contradictory tendencies inherent in these systems: "the negative, currently dominant, tendency toward control, and the positive, more latent potential toward collectivity." The book continues this general line of inquiry in relation to curating, and extends it by considering how power relations and control are expressed in the context of network systems and immateriality. In relation to network systems, the emphasis remains on the democratic potential of technological change but also the emergence of what appears as more intensive forms of control. Can the same be said of curating in the context of distributed forms? If so, what does this imply for software curating beyond the rhetoric of free software and open systems? The third book in the DATA Browser series of critical texts that explore issues at the intersection of culture and technology.

Cautionary Tales: Critical Curating
Steven Rand and Header Kouris, editors
Apexart 2007
ISBN-10: 1933347104
Ten international art related professionals consider the increased influence of independent curators and cultural producers and how the role of the curator has changed over the last ten years. Using examples from past exhibitions and personal experiences, the writers address how working within an institution differs from being independent, the difficulties of balancing artistic vision with expectations of funders and institutions, and the ethical issues of working with artists and collectors, among many other subjects. A resource text for students and others interested in the curatorial field, Cautionary Tales: Critical Curating provides valuable and interesting reading for students considering a curatorial career and others interested in current trends in today's art world.

Curating Now: Imaginative Practice/Public Responsibility
Paula Marincola, editor
Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative, 2002
ISBN-10: 0970834608
In a time which one critic characterized recently as "the era of the curator," it is not only relevant but absolutely necessary to thoroughly question the current state of curatorial practice, its professional values, and the assumptions implicit in them. Curating Now gathers together the thoughts of a diverse group of internationally recognized, influential curators, comments presented for the benefit and examination of their peers at a weekend-long symposium held in October 2000. Questions regarding curatorial power and authorship, as well as how external pressures and challenges shape exhibitions, were addressed by participants including Robert Storr, Senior Curator, The Museum of Modern Art, New York; Thelma Golden, Deputy Director of exhibitions, the Studio Museum in Harlem, New York; Hans-Ulrich Obrist, Curator, Musee d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris; and Nicholas Serota, Director, Tate Gallery, London.

Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance
Judith Rugg and Michele Sedgwick, eds.
Bristol, UK: Intellect, 2007
ISBN 978-1-84150-162-8
I reviewed this book for Leonardo Reviews May 2008.
Read that review here.

Curating Media/Net/Art
Sabine Hochrieser, Michael Kargl (a.k.a. carlos katastrofsky), Franz Thalmair, eds.
Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt [Herstellng und Verlag], Vienna, 2007
ISBN: 978-3-8370-0880-7
Learn more online, HERE

Back to Top
An Archival Experiment
An archive would seem to be, at any time, of a variable nature.
The common theme in these definitions is that an archive refers to a collection (whether historical records or cultural artifacts), the location in which this collection is kept, and the information/knowledge experience potential in that collection.

No matter the scale, an archive should function, on one hand, as the adaptive site of public education and democratic access, and, on the other, serve as an enduring and sacral repository for precious objects (Haidee Wilson. "Every Home an Art Museum." Residual Media. Charles R. Acland, editor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007. 164.).

An archive can be as grand as a palace, or as personal as a photograph. In either case, the archive, and its potential to transform information into knowledge, is only realized through encounter.

So, an experiment. Below are four videos originally "published" on YouTube. Each deals with the idea of how information accessibility resulting from Web 2.0 technologies/capabilities are changing the way we deal with information; or how information is changing us. How might we archive these four videos so that we organize, manage, and add value to them as a collection of information artifacts?

One way is to organize them in a logical narrative structure: beginning, middle, end. I have done this below, and provided curatorial statements for each, in order to provide context, and connection. The collection makes some sense in this arrangement but it is really in the encounter that the archive works, or not. Take a look. Does the encounter with the archival structure work? Is there a different way in which this collection might be encountered?

In this video, "Information Revolution," Michael Wesch, a cultural anthropologist at Kansas State University, argues that information has traditionally been considered a "thing," found in a logical place (on a shelf, in a file system, in a category). Managing information required experts. And despite their best efforts, information is still hard to find.

Digital information has no material form and so we no longer need complex hierarchies. Trillions of links provide web users with millions of potential information paths; access to more information than was ever created by the experts. And we organize this information ourselves, without material constraints. The new order of order is that everything is miscellaneous. We no longer find information, we can make it find us. It's an information revolution and the responsibility for control is on us. Are we ready?

Note: This is a cloned copy of Wesch's video. The linked version is available on YouTube, HERE.

Another video by Michael Wesch, which, conceptually, seems to follow the points raised in "Information Revolution." In this video, entitled "The Machine is Us/ing Us," Wesch suggests the web (also called Web 2.0, The Machine) exists only as a function of the people who use and populate its virtual spaces and potentials, its shape and structure defined by the way we use the information amassed there. In this sense, Web 2.0 is an archive, one that learns how to organize itself based on how users interact with the available information.

Note: This is a cloned copy of Wesch's video. The linked version is available on YouTube, HERE.

A linked, earlier, version of this video is available HERE.

This is a response to Wesch's ideas, presented in the same manner as his original video. The author makes the valid point that the issues addressed by the blogosphere are, really, non-issues, not the ones that really affect the lives of people. In conclusion, the author wonders whether "we will use Web 2.0 to further distance ourselves from others, or will we actually come together as Professor Wesch implies?"

Note: This is a cloned copy of Wesch's video. The linked version is apparently no longer available on YouTube.

This is another response to Wesch. Here the author, "CoryTheRaven," argues that the Internet, is, despite what Wesch says, essentially non-participatory; it simply simulates, through text and movies, "the natural interaction between us and the world." Our efforts to make the Internet seem more and more interactive will lead, eventually, to "increasingly sophisticated pseudo-sensory simulations of the full sensory participatory reality." In the meantime, with Web 2.0, we are simply trying to make the printed word "imitate what we already experience every day."

Note: This is a cloned copy of CoryTheRaven's video. The linked version is available on YouTube, HERE.

Back to Top
Example Archives
Information Portal Archives Library Archives Legacy/Memory Preservation Archives Ethnic History Archives Sound Archives Food and Drink Archives People Archives
Personal Collection Archives Miscellaneous but Very Interesting Archives
Back to Top
Projects
Authenticity of the Record: A Central Concern for Archiving
Whether analog or digital, another big focus of archiving is assuring the authenticity of a record. How do we know a particular archival record is what it perports to be? How do we know that the archival record is an authentic copy of the original record?

So much of archiving is based in our history of dealing with paper. And so, questions . . . Archivists have, and continue, to take different approaches to address these questions.

One approach, based in our traditional history with paper, has been to observe the "original order" of the archived objects; to place objects in a collection in the order in which they were created, or received.

A different approach is to follow a more "conceptual order" based on individual needs of the archive user. What then becomes the role of the archivist?

In all cases, archivists follow rather specific steps during acquistion in order to assure authenticity . . .
Analog vs. Digital :: Static vs. Moving
Where analog archives are inherently static and users must come to the archive, digital archives are mobile and can travel to the users, through various media (Kasdorf, William E., editor. The Columbia Guide to Digital Publishing. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003. 305. ISBN 0231124996).

What does this mean for archiving?
See "Digital Curating—Working notes for an evolving paper" (above) for connections and ideas.

Hardware/software obsolescence means there is no guarantee that successful efforts today will be successful in the future. How to deal with this problem?
Control vs. Chaos
Librarians and other professional archivists want control.

New forms of digital media and art may require that we embrace chaos when talking about or pursuing the archiving of artifacts.

Is there a Role for Entertainment in Archiving and Curating?; Are Archiving and Curating about Entertainment?
Notes from Timeline (Crichton, Michael. 442-443, 480)
My thoughts now . . . For these reasons historical archives are popular (see examples elsewhere on this page)

Historical archives educate, but they also entertain. Is the role of archiving and curating then entertainment?

How might we construct an historical archive that both preserves and educates regarding the past, but also provides entertainment and inspiration for the present and future?

More specifically, how would you create an historical archive (of any kind) focusing on your life, or that of your family, given the considerations for the importance of entertainment noted above?

Archiving, Curating, Interdisciplinarity, and Transliteracy
Transliteracy is a field of inquiry currently being pioneered by Sue Thomas (Institute of Creative Technologies, De Montfort University, United Kingdom; see the website HERE).

Thomas and her colleagues define transliteracy as "the ability to read, write, and interact across a range of platforms, tools, and media from signing and orality through handwriting, print, television, radio, and film to digital social networks."

Transliteracy is, then, interdisciplinary in that it combines components and/or ideas from several different fields in new ways to provide a new prospective on a particular line of inquiry. (This is different from multidisciplinary which simply combines multiple fields of study; the economics of social networking, for example.)

Transliteracy, as an interdisciplinary study, disrupts the former linear orientation of any one particular form of literacy as it gives way to chaotic social networks.

Transliteracy might also be seen as a form of archiving. And here the interesting questions begin . . .
Design:
Unity in color and font styles; variety in photo and text sizes
Color used to identify sections; or affect mood (cool colors are calming, warmer colors promote action)
"Focal points" provide visual impact / interest

Works and Life Archive
A collection / narration based around the works and life of a particular artist/writer/performer/person. For an example, see Brautigan Bibliography and Archive HERE

Information Portal / Resource
A collection of all aspects of information about or resources related to a particular subject, like "Foxfire" (see above).

Copyright
Copyright is a major consideration for any archival effort.

With copyright, the owner/creator/designated agent(s) has the exclusive right to copy, distribute, display, and perform their work.

Copyright is automatic. No notice of copyright is required.

Copyright lasts a LONG time—70 years after the death of the author or 95 years for works owned by companies.

There are exemptions to the exclusive rights built into the copyright law—Fair Use is one—but they can be tricky to figure out. For example, here are my notes from a discusson of Fair Use in which I recently participated.

Copyright Act of 1976
Section 107. Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use
Nothwithstanding the provisions of Section 106 and 106A the fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction of copies or phonorecords or by any means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
  1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commerical nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
  2. The nature of the copyrighted work
  3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
  4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work
The Association of Research Libraries maintains web-based information on "Copyright and Intellectual Property Issues." Included here is further information about Fair Use. Read this information HERE

Clearly, most digital archival efforts would not qualify under this Fair Use limitation. So, in addition to obtaining permissions from rights holders, how should we consider copyright, when, for example, archival efforts and acquisitions include personal / publically available websites?

How should we consider copyright when the model upon which it is based, does not, arguabley, fit into the current social, technological, and market realities of the day? Cory Doctorow argues "No business model, art form, or practice has an inherent right to exist: it has to fit in with the social, technological, and market realities of its day. . . . Technology enables creativity, community, art, and love. Crippling it to save someone's outmoded business-model is a crim against humanity ("Foreward." Sound Unbound: Sampling Digital Music and Culture. Paul D. Miller aka DJ Spooky that Subliminal Kid, ed. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2008. xi)

Both the UCLA Online Campaign Literature Archive and the Our Digital Island: A Tasmanian Web Archive (see above, under "Archive Examples") do this, and both have policies for takedown and exclusion of specific personal websites at the owner's / creator's request.

More generally, how might /should copyright factor into considerations for developing an archive of born digital and other publically available materials, media, etc.? For example, consider The Brautigan Library, where unpublished authors submit their unpublished manuscripts. Clearly, the original authors are the rights holders, but how might one proceed to turn these submitted manuscripts into a digital archive available to anyone interested?

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (enacted into law 28 October 1998) was intended to stop illegal copying of digital content (digital piracy of movies, recordings, and software).

For an overview of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, see HERE

Read the final version (Enrolled Bill) as passed by both Houses HERE

Download a copy of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (in PDF format) HERE

Among the Act's provisions is one that allows internet service providers from copyright infringement in digital contexts, including allowing service providers to remove content from individual web sites that appears to involve copyright infringement (the so called "safe harbor provision"). Again, considering The Brautigan Library (see above), how might one construct and curate a digital archive in order to avoid this situation?

While supported by the software and entertainment industries, as well as internet service providers, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act was opposed by librarians, scientists, and academics. In a report entitled "Unintended Consequences: Four Years under the DMCA," The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues the Act has
  1. "Chilled" the legitimate free-speech activities of journalists, publishers, scientists, students, programmers, and members of the public
  2. Granted copyright owners "the power to unilaterally eliminate the public's fair use rights"
  3. Impeded competition and innovation. For example, Sony uses the Act to protect their monopoly on Playstaion video game consoles as well as their "regionalization" systems that limits users from playing games legitimately in other countries
Read the report "Unintended Consequences: Four Years under the DMCA" HERE

The Anti-DMCA website archives information opposing The Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Learn more HERE

A report released 3 August 2007 by MCPS-PRS Alliance, which represents music rights holders, and Big Champagne, an online media measurement company, concluded that the music industry "should embrace illegal websites" because torrent and peer-to-peer filing sharing sites and services could not be stopped. Brand loyalty (and revenue) could be built through increased concert ticket sales as well as the sales of licensed products at digital sources (YouTube, Google, etc.) currently beyond the reach of the record industry. Read the article, "Music Industry "Should Embrace Illegal Websites'," at the Financial Times.com website, HERE

DJ Culture as an Archival Impulse
Paul Miller (aka DJ Spooky that Subliminal Kid) says
Lay one metaphor onto the other, remix, and press play. The sampling machine can handle any sound, and any expression. You just have to find the right edit points in the sound envelope—it's that structure thing come back as downloadable shareware for the informationally perplexed (6).

Form and function, fact and fiction, art and architecture—all woven into a testimony of human reconstruction in media (8).

The remix becomes "faction" (9).

We live in an era where quotation and sampling operate on such a deep level that the archaeology of what can be called "knowledge" floats in a murky realm between the real and the unreal. Look at The Matrix as an updated version of Plato's cave, a parable piece in his Republic written more than two thousand years ago, but still resonant with the idea of living in a world of illusion (11).

Think of DJ culture as a kind of archival impulse applied to a kind of hunter-gather milieu—textual poaching, becomes zero-paid, becomes no-logo, becomes brand x. It's that interface thing again, but this time around the mind-brain interface becomes an emergent system of large-scale economies of expression (13). (Paul Miller aka DJ Spooky that Subliminal Kid. "In through the Out Door." Sound Unbound: Sampling Digital Music and Culture. Paul D. Miller aka DJ Spooky that Subliminal Kid, ed. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2008.)

Digital Archiving: Theory and Practice
"Rethinking Personal Digital Archiving, Part 1"
An interesting study of the the inclination we all share, to hang on to things associated with our personal lives. Specifically examines the overlay of digital technology on this endeavor to examine four challenges from the field.

Best Practices for Digital Archiving: An Information Life Cycle Approach
This article argues that many of the established traditions associated with digital archiving are inadequate, inappropriate or not well known among the stakeholders in the digital environment. Concludes a need to identify new best practices that satisfy the requirements and are practical for the various stakeholder groups involved.

Electronic Literature
The Electronic Literature Organization was established in 1999 to promote and facilitate the writing, publishing, and reading of electronic literature. The term "electronic literature" refers to works with important literary aspects that take advantage of the capabilities and contexts provided by the stand-alone or networked computer. Within the broad category of electronic literature are several forms and threads of practice, some of which are: Read N. Catherine Hayles "Electronic Literature: What Is It?" HERE

This online article is a companion to Hayles' book, About Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Learn more HERE

Among many initiatives, ELO is working to conceive, design, and build successful models for archiving various forms of electronic literture. President Joe Tabbi has written an essay entitled "Toward a Semantic Literary Web: Setting a Direction for the Electronic Literature Organizations's Directory." You can read this essay HERE

In conjunction with Tabbi's essay, you should also read "Acid Free Bits: Recommendations for Long-Lasting Electronic Literature" by Nick Montfort and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. Read this essay HERE.

You should also read "Born-Again Bits: A Framework for Migrating Electronic Literature" by Alan Liu, David Durand, Nick Montfort, Merrilee Proffitt, Liam R. E. Quin, Jean-Hugues Réty, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. Read this essay HERE

What problems can you identify with regard to archiving electronic literature? How might these problems be addressed? In the various models for digital archives mentioned or detailed in these essays, has something been overlooked? Can you suggest a new, or different, model for a digital archive focusing on works of electronic literature? And after the archive is created, how might one curate the works collected within? What information would be good to feature along with the works themselves? And speaking of the works, would you collect only one version, or all? How about drafts, notes, other "stuff" the author may have used or relied upon during the process of creating a work of electronic literature?

New Media
The idea, and practice, of archiving and curating New Media works is also intriguing. What problems might one encounter? What models are already in place for such an archive? What potential models are available to guide future thinking? How might one proceed to build and maintain an archive for some form, or many forms, of New Media?